Returned mail: User unknown

[Mail Delivery Subsystem]

The original message was received at Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:48:18 +0200 (MET DST)
from ns1.cdrail.cz [193.86.15.2]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<husek@datis.cdrail.cz>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailkriz.datis.cdrail.cz.:
>>> RCPT To:<husek@datis.cdrail.cz>
<<< 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
550 <husek@datis.cdrail.cz>... User unknown

   ----- Original message follows -----

Return-Path: <hw-news@mobil.cz>
Received: from ns1.cdrail.cz by cd00000phaux000.pha.cdrail.cz; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/01Aug96-0244PM)
	id LAA23640; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:48:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (qmail 2549 invoked from network); 8 Apr 1999 09:48:18 -0000
Received: from diana.mobil.cz (HELO mobil.cz) (194.213.194.6)
  by ns1.cdrail.cz with SMTP; 8 Apr 1999 09:48:17 -0000
Received: from diana (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mobil.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA25911;
	Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:48:42 +0200
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:48:42 +0200
Message-Id: <14A3CCE14F9@FELIS.FELD.CVUT.CZ>
Errors-To: rehak@hw.cz
Reply-To: hw-news@mobil.cz
Originator: hw-news@mobil.cz
Sender: hw-news@mobil.cz
Precedence: bulk
From: "Ondrej Puzman" <puzmano@feld.cvut.cz>
To: Multiple recipients of list <hw-news@mobil.cz>
Subject: Re: Progr. AT - dotaz
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0 -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HW-News List, nejruznejsi informace o bastleni (WWW.HW.CZ)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v3.01d)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0


> Prominte moji blbost,
> ale mam takovyto problem. Postavil jsem 
> programator ATMELU dle dokumentace HW, originalni 
> DPS. Po pripojeni k PC software hlasi, ze 
> programator nenalezl. Tak jsem to krokoval a 
> meril. Na datovem i ridicim registru je to v 
> poradku, na vystupu z multiplexeru uz vsak ne. 
> ( software ukazule na vstupu stale 00000000?) Uz 
> jsem vymenil i multiplexer 74LS157, vysledek 
> stale stejny. Dale jsem si napsal programek, 
> ktery zapise do datoveho registru, a zpetne to 
> precte pres multiplexer. Vysledek ponekud jiny, 
> "vetsinou" se lisi pouze jeden bit. 
> Zkouseno na 3 PC.
> Pokud by me mohl nekdo kopnout, budu velice 
> vdecny.

No ja jsem si ho stavel taky a funguje mi, ale pouze na 386ce na 
notebooku (486) ma nejakej problem se ctenim (mozna je to 
spatnou citlivosti toho notebookovyho portu). Na jinejch pocitacich 
jsem to nezkousel.
Po osazeni mi hned nechtel fungovat, ale to byl jen spatne 
zapajenej jeden pin na patici procesoru (byl to jeden z tech co 
urcuji programovaci a cteci mody)

                  Ondra